5月雅思考试写作优秀1 Somepeopleprefertostayinthesamejobforthesamecompany,butothersprefertochangejobsfrequen下面是小编为大家整理的5月雅思考试写作3篇,供大家参考。
5月雅思考试写作优秀1
Some people prefer to stay in the same job for the same company, but others prefer to change jobs frequently. You should use specific reasons to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both sides.
people rarely have an absolute consensus on the controversial issue whether a man should intend to go in for a life-time career. These day, very few people prefer to always taking a position.
in some senses, a life-time career has its merits. First, if you stick at taking a post, all angles of the job will have appeared; after some time, you will definitely have a good command of it. Consequently you may become a veteran of the field and earn respect or prestige from others. Second, you can establish an extensive social connections relating to the field, helping you tear down most of the barriers standing in the way of your working endeavor. Finally, mistakes of the routine tasks would be minimized because you have learned the lessons.
however, as the modern society develops, experiencing different jobs has its advantages. Initially, we look at the issue of bribery. Many high-level staff are inclined to accept bribes via power in hand. However, if he knows that someone else will soon take his place, such acts can be avoided. We then look at work motivation. If one works for the same company for a long time without promotion, he may get sick and tired of doing the same daily routine. Nonetheless, a manager should have qualities of a sense of teamwork and the capability of coordination. Therefore, to try various positions can help you gain ground to be promoted.
In summary, staying in the same post can cultivate one to cut out for the job but involve one in a boring career while changing jobs frequently can be both advantageous by keeping bribery away and providing one with more opportunities of promotion and disadvantageous by making mistakes occasionally. In my opinion, people should seek a decent and good-paid job and pay little attention to changing it.
5月雅思考试写作优秀2
Most universities and colleges spend a rather long period in fundamental theories and elementary courses. But students regard these kinds of knowledge useless, and pay less attention to them. Thus, some people think that university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to give practical training benefit to society. As for me, I think this view is reasonable in some aspects.
First of all, the theoretical knowledge just handles problem is an abstract concept. It must combine with real job, can just give play to its efficiency. The theoretical knowledge losing contact with reality is nonsensical. For instance, as everyone knows, with the development of society, Work position more and more need experienced talent, that is to say, they need those people who can combine theoretical knowledge with practice. So, more offering practice training to university students can help them to adapt to the society better.
Secondly, the theoretical knowledge root in practice. Any theory knowledge is obtained from the work of practicing. The universities provide practical training to students, make them understand the theoretical knowledge dee*. Just because of this, more and more universities stipulate that students should participate in social work at least one year in the four years, in order to get practical training.
However, the theoretical knowledge is the quintessence of practice, and it is the important course that we can"t ignore too. So, theoretical knowledge and practice have the equal status in our study.
In a word, theory knowledge and practical training are all our required courses. We must study theory knowledge, and then ap* it to practice. Just like what a famous sayings said: thoughts can give off brilliant light only when put into actions.
5月雅思考试写作优秀3
Children - Nature or Nurture?
Which one has deeper influence on molding children’s personalities and their development nature or nurture?
In certain respects, children are the same all over the world. But when they grow up, they become quite different. What has caused such considerable changes? I believe nurture plays the crucial role in personality and development of a child. In another word, the circumstances surrounding the child are more important to form its character.
As an old saying remarked, ‘No man is born wise or learned’. Had nobody taught him, a man would even not be able to count from 1 to 10, no matter how talented he were. In fact, a nascent infant to who has scarcely given birth, in certain aspects, is just the same as a kitten being no aware of so-called character. Its nature is to cry for food when it feels hungry, or cry for release when it feels uncomfortable. That is that. The true story of ‘wolf-child’ can be the best evidence.
On the other hand, the parents, teachers, as well as other people around a child, are the main builders who develop its personality. Learning from the circumstances, the child forms its character and concepts of the world. People always say ‘the best horse needs breeding, and the aptest child needs teaching.’ Without correct guidance, a clear conscience can even go bad. For instance, a father is a deep drug addict, and in most cases, his son starts this dangerous experience very early, by reason of smoky air he has breathed since his childhood. Such situation is not rare. On the contrary, we often hear similar news from media.
As you can tell from my *ysis, among all factors affecting the growth of children, nurture is the crucial one, which is much more important than the nature or any other else.
